2644 StatementsonStandardsforAccountingandReviewServices
she considers necessary in the circumstances. For example, the predecessor
may wish to discuss this information with the successor or to review the en-
gagement documentation of the successor as it relates to the matters affecting
the prior-period nancial statements. If the predecessor decides, based on the
information obtained, that his or her report on the prior-period nancial state-
ments should be revised, he or she should follow the guidance in paragraphs
.14–.15 and .23–.24. [Revised, December 2010, to reect conforming changes
necessary due to the issuance of SSARS No. 19.]
.23 A predecessor's knowledge of the current affairs of his or her former
client is obviously limited in the absence of a continuing relationship. Conse-
quently, when reissuing his or her report on the prior-period nancial state-
ments, a predecessor should use the date of his or her previous report to avoid
any implication that he or she has performed procedures after that date other
than those described in paragraphs .20–.22. If the predecessor revises his or her
report or if the nancial statements are restated, he or she should dual-date his
or her report (for example, "March 1, 20X1, except for note X, as to which the
date is March 15, 20X2"). The predecessor's responsibility for events occurring
subsequent to the completion of his or her engagement is limited to the spe-
cic event referred to in the note or otherwise disclosed. He or she should also
obtain a written statement from the former client setting forth the informa-
tion currently acquired and its effect on the prior-period nancial statements
and, if applicable, expressing an understanding of its effect on the predecessor's
reissued report.
.24 If a predecessor is unable to complete the procedures described in
paragraphs .20–.23, he or she should not reissue his or her report and may
wish to consult with his or her attorney regarding the appropriate course of
action.
Restated Prior-Period Financial Statements
.25 When prior-period nancial statements have been restated,
10
the pre-
decessor accountant would normally reissue his or her report following the
guidance in paragraph .22. If the predecessor decides not to reissue his or her
report, the successor accountant may be engaged to report on the nancial
statements for the prior year. If the predecessor accountant does not reissue
his or her report and the successor accountant is not engaged to report on the
prior year nancial statements, the successor accountant should indicate in the
introductory paragraph of his or her compilation or review report that a pre-
decessor accountant reported on the nancial statements of the prior period
before restatement. In addition, if the successor accountant is engaged to com-
pile or review the restatement adjustment(s), he or she may also indicate in the
accountant's report that he or she compiled or reviewed the adjustment(s) that
was (were) applied to restate prior-year nancial statements. [As amended, ef-
fective for compilations and reviews of nancial statements for periods ending
after December 15, 2005, by SSARS No. 12.]
.26 See exhibit A and exhibit B for examples of reports when the pre-
decessor accountant's report is not presented and the successor accountant is
10
See paragraphs .10–.11 of section 400, Communications Between Predecessor and Successor
Accountants, for guidance regarding communication to the predecessor accountant with respect to
information that leads the successor accountant to believe that the nancial statements reported on
by the predecessor accountant may require revision. [Footnote added, effective for compilations and
reviews of nancial statements for periods ending after December 15, 2005, by SSARS No. 12.]
AR §200.23 ©2016, AICPA