Ensuring that all of Pennsylvania’s children have equal access to a quality public education.
effectiveness, and current vaccine coverage, layered prevention strategies, such as wearing masks,
are needed to reduce the transmission of this variant.”
8
As a fourth wave of the coronavirus surges,
polls show that Americans overwhelmingly support protecting the common good by mandating that
individuals wear protective masks as "a matter of health and safety" in schools.
9
Legal Basis to Undertake Action
Against this backdrop, the Education Law Center has received multiple calls and inquiries from
parents and community members across the state who are seeking to challenge policy decisions of
their school boards and districts which have refused to establish universal mask requirements. In
some cases, districts have also refused to require COVID-19 testing or quarantining in the event that
students or staff test positive for COVID-19. Examples of such districts include: Avon Grove
School District, Apollo Ridge SD, Delaware Valley SD, Erie City SD, Millcreek Township SD,
Northern Bedford County SD, Northern York County SD, Penn Manor SD, Scranton SD, Souderton
Area SD, Tamaqua Area School District, Wallenpaupack SD, Wilson Area School District.
Notably, in one case, a federal court recently granted a restraining order against North Allegheny
School District and ordered the District to reinstate a mandatory mask policy based in part on a
finding of irreparable harm to the school staff, students, and visitors.
10
We urge that the Department address the concerns raised by parents regarding the health, safety,
and welfare of their children by issuing a clear directive that schools must require masks and
address potential infections among school community members. The failure to require universal
masking not only fails to qualify as a reasonable measure to ensure the health and safety of students
but affirmatively places schoolchildren and school staff at significant risk of foreseeable, direct and
substantial harm of infection by a known highly contagious and potentially deadly virus.
11
Policies which make masks optional or fail to address COVID-19 outbreaks also disproportionately
impact students with disabilities in violation of federal disability laws, including Title II of the
Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 USC §12132; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended, 29 U.S.C. § 794; and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S. Code §
8
Id.
9
See e.g., School mask, vaccine mandates supported in US: AP-NORC poll (6 in 10 Americans say students and
teachers should be required to wear face masks while in school, according to poll from The Associated Press-NORC
Center for Public Affairs Research) (August 23, 2021) available at
https://apnews.com/article/lifestyle-health-education-
coronavirus-pandemic-only-on-ap-0440d83602da918c571d506a3de9f44b; No vaccination? Americans back tough rules
and mask mandates to protect the common good (August 22, 2021) (An overwhelming 72% v. 28% of those surveyed
by USA TODAY and Ipsos called mask mandates "a matter of health and safety") available at
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2021/08/22/americans-back-mask-covid-vaccine-mandate-protect-
common-good/8134392002/.
10
U.S. judge to North Allegheny School District: Everyone has to wear a mask, Pittsburgh Post Gazette (April 23,
2021), https://www.post-gazette.com/news/education/2021/08/23/North-Allegheny-School-District-na-mask-mandate-
requirement-parents-students-restraining-order/stories/202108230063
11
While as a general rule, school entities are shielded from liability under the Pennsylvania Political Subdivision Tort
Claims Act, 42 Pa. C.S. § 8541, there are exceptions to the doctrine of qualified immunity, including claims of a “state
created danger” whereby “the harm ultimately caused was foreseeable and fairly direct; a state actor acted with a degree
of culpability that shocks the conscience; the plaintiff was a foreseeable victim or a “member of a discrete class of
persons subjected to the potential harm brought about by the state’s actions”; and a state actor affirmatively used their
authority in a way that created a danger to the citizen or rendered the citizen more vulnerable to danger.